San Mateo Antes Up for Flood-Free Future

When San Mateo Creek topped its banks during last winter’s relentless winter storms, Danielle Cwirko-Godycki’s home became one of thousands in the city to flood. The event highlighted San Mateo’s aging and underfunded stormwater infrastructure, and prompted Cwirko-Godycki to spearhead a campaign to create a revenue fund dedicated to rehabilitating the city’s flood protection system. The effort culminated last month in the passage of a parcel tax that will raise $4 million annually to upgrade and maintain the city’s network of storm drains, culverts, creeks, and pump stations, as well as dredge Marina Lagoon, which was designed as a flood control basin but last year spilled into nearby neighborhoods. 

“We have a $168 million deficit worth of projects in terms of what needs to be upgraded,” says Cwirko-Godycki, who founded Flood Free San Mateo in the aftermath of the 2022-2023  storms. “San Mateo has 17 creeks. Their culverts were designed for 100-year flood events, but because they’re over 70 years old, some of them can’t even withstand a 10-year storm event.” She notes that although San Mateo has historically experienced flooding every 20 years, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration now predicts it’s now likely to be every five to eight years. 

Cwirko-Godycki initially found it hard to get the City Council’s attention. But tapping her experience as a former organizer for Barack Obama, she soon began networking with businesses and residents. “We found almost 10,000 homes and businesses that flooded across San Mateo and then it just kind of spiraled into the city council reaching out and asking us to help get this ballot measure passed.” 

“The community told us that we really had to do a lot more,” says San Mateo Mayor Lisa Diaz Nash. “They got themselves together and worked closely with our Department of Public Works, and came up with a plan.”

In November, property owners received a ballot seeking approval for a Community Flood and Storm Protection Fee. The measure, which passed with almost 52% of the vote, will impose a fee averaging $8 per month, depending on parcel size. 

“We went with $8 because when we surveyed likely voters that was what came back as what residents could tolerate,” says Cwirko-Godycki. The actual amount needed to fund current projects is closer to $19 per parcel; her organization is working with the city to pursue additional state and federal funding to close the gap. “The $8 fee gets us on the dartboard to go after matching funds. You are only eligible for some of these critical grants if the community has a stormwater fee.”

The funds will go into a dedicated enterprise account, meaning they cannot be diverted to other projects. 

“I think that was a big selling point.” says Cwirko-Godycki. “People know that the city will have accountability. The money’s not going into the general fund, it’s going into the specific infrastructure account.”