12 Creek Types: Which One Is In Your Backyard?
Many Bay Area residents live near a creek, whether it’s the billionaire on the ridge, a family in the foothills, the urbanites in the metropolitan zone, or the houseless seeking nature, water, and privacy on public land. Bay Area creeks come in all shapes and sizes — some are lined with concrete to carry storm flows, and others have been patched or propped up or culverted here and there as humans try to moderate the effects of these waterways on their homes, businesses, roads, and bridges.
Creeks can be both a benefit (wildlife habitat, groundwater recharge) and a liability (erosion, flooding), especially with climate change, as storms fueled by big winds and bigger rains send torrents of water and debris down them in a flash.
“Depending on the stream type, almost everyone is vulnerable,” says UC Davis geomorphologist Gregory Pasternack, who has led the development of a classification system he hopes every creek neighbor will familiarize themselves with. In science papers and colorful ID cards published earlier this year, Pasternack’s team documents 12 types of Bay Area creeks and offers various useful details about topography, function, relative flood threats, and restoration or management options.
Other Recent Posts
New Study Shows Rain Gardens Filter Chemicals Out of Stormwater
Scientists found rain gardens dramatically reduce toxic chemicals in stormwater while providing biodiversity and cooling.
The Tricky Art of Growing Oysters in the Lab So They Can Survive in the Field
The Nature Conservancy, the Amah Mutsun Tribal Band, and others are growing oysters in the lab and planting them in the wild in estuaries around San Francisco Bay.
Printing Without Plastic: The Vintage Machine Winning Over Eco-Conscious Artists
This comic guide to risograph printing explains how the 1980s Japanese machine cuts energy use and avoids plastic toner.
East Bay Kids Fight Extreme Heat in their Schoolyards
Many California schools are ill-equipped to tackle heat, with many campuses lacking sufficient tree coverage. These students are fighting to change that.
How a North Bay Regional Park Helped Me Reconnect With Nature — and Myself
A young Fairfield resident reflects on how hiking during the pandemic became a refuge from digital overload and the growing realities of climate change.
Wild Pigs Rough Up Bay Area Greens
They tear up landscapes in search of food, prey on native wildlife, and damage streams, and warming could bring them closer to urban areas.
Map: Color coded map of Bay Area stream types based on 2,435 site checks and the UC Davis’ team’s resulting classification and prediction system (A1-armored channel; A2-bank-hardened river; A3-naturalizing channel; A4-large canal; A5-bank-hardened canal; A6-ditch; N1-headwater steep stream; N2-lowland/meadow small stream; N3-mountain stream; N4-entrenched riffle pool system; N5-valley floor riffle-pool system; N6-large entrenched lowland stream. Source: Pasternack et al 2026
“Creeks today require even more mindful stewardship. Whether you’re wealthy or not, most homeowners can’t handle the costs of cleanup and a fix, or don’t even know how to get a permit,” he says.
Pasternack imagines a person in a Marin canyon or Santa Clara Valley floodplain looking at the creek or canal in their backyard, identifying the type from the ID cards, and getting enough information to think about appropriate repair or restoration measures for that creek type. “Maybe one canal is totally bare and lined with rip rap, but another canal has a wetland full of turtles and toads in a strip down the middle of it,” he says. “Each site or section of river has a unique personality.”
Pasternack is now printing up his ID cards in English, Spanish, and Chinese, and building out the supporting website.
A thought leader, Pasternack hopes to see the region’s hundreds of nonprofit stewardship and creek groups think more about supporting homeowners struggling with competing goals: fuel reduction for wildfire management versus leaving hillsides and creek banks bare of stabilizing roots and more susceptible to erosion. He hopes they can propose best practices in the “$500-$5,000” range of price tags that more people can afford. “Somebody may be fairly wealthy, but that doesn’t mean they want to spend $500,000 on a stream bank stabilization project,” he says.
“I want people living and working in the Bay Area to know that the streams in their region, their backyards, their communities come in a wide variety, and there’s not a one-size-fits-all solution to the problems they bring.”
Top photo: Creek surveys (Martin Perales, Napa RCD, and Tasha Royal, Dr. Nikhil Kumar, and Sarah Pyle of UC Davis). Photo: Greg Pasternack.



