New Rules on Rebuilds, FEMA Says No to Wet Feet
The federal government has spliced a formal recognition of climate change into national building policies. The milestone rule, announced July 10 by the Biden Administration’s Federal Emergency Management Agency, requires that new construction projects supported by federal emergency funding be built to withstand extreme floods, including high waters resulting from the anticipated rise in sea level. The Federal Flood Risk Management Standard will take effect September 9 and finishes an initiative kicked off by President Barack Obama, with Joe Biden then as Vice-President, almost a decade ago.
The new building rules, which the Trump Administration retracted in 2017 before they could take effect in their first iteration, require federal officials to specifically set necessary dimensions for a planned project – namely width, height, and coverage – to protect it and the immediate community against flooding. The rule will affect public infrastructure like roadways, bridges, and water and sewer lines as well as community services like schools, libraries, fire and police stations, and public recreation sites. Only projects funded by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, or FEMA, are subject to the rules.
Environmental groups have cheered the flooding risk management standard as an important defensive step forward as the planet warms, sea level rises, and storms hit communities with amplified force.
“This is about planning for the future, and it’s based on the latest and best available science,” said Shana Udvardy, senior climate resilience policy analyst with the Union of Concerned Scientists.
Severe storms and flooding are two of the three most destructive types of natural disasters in the United States and, according to federal estimates, have caused more than half a trillion dollars in damage since 1980. In California, devastating floods of recent winters in the San Joaquin Valley and Central Coast regions have highlighted local vulnerabilities to high waters, and in coastal communities around the Bay Area, rising sea level is an ever-present threat. While the new standards represent an important recognition of flood dangers, the California Ocean Protection Council’s 2024 Sea Level Rise Guidance report anticipates an increase of local sea level by as much as 3.1 feet – conspicuously more than the federal rule’s recommendation that construction be elevated above local flood levels by two to three feet.
Jon Rosenfield, the science director with San Francisco Baykeeper, says he applauds the intent of the federal rule but thinks it may be overlooking certain basic threats of rising sea level. For one, he says, sea level rise doesn’t only correspond to inundated surface area but also can cause encroachment of groundwater into developed areas – a process that can undermine infrastructure sites and polluted soils before they are technically flooded. The other shortcoming Rosenfield sees is that some of FEMA’s flood risk maps, which establish base flood levels, are out of date.
“It’s very good that the Biden Administration is highlighting this issue that places not threatened by flooding now will be in the future, but the baseline that’s being used is not adequate,” he said.
Bay Area infrastructure sites most threatened by flooding as sea level rises, Rosenfield says, include several wastewater treatment plants, bridge foundations, and East Bay freeways.
Other Recent Posts
Affordability Top of Mind For 6 Oaklanders This Election Season
KneeDeep’s Alex McCutcheon spent a recent afternoon asking passers by along Lake Merritt for their thoughts on affordability and climate change.
A Wasted Opportunity
Too many of this year’s crop of Democratic candidates are squandering the opportunity to connect the affordability crisis to the climate crisis.
Climate Issues On Your Ballot This Fall
Voters have a chance to approve more than $13 billion in resilient and transportation infrastructure funding for the Bay Area and the state this midterm election.
The Sleepy Midterm Race with the Biggest Influence on Climate Policy
Typically an undercovered downballot race in the past, the election of California’s next insurance commissioner could reshape the state’s fire and flood coverage.
Fire Weather in the Wind
As the hot Nevada air cools every fall, it gets pushed west to lower pressure areas over the Central Valley, where the wind heats up and dries out.
My Morning Cleaning Up the Oakland Estuary
On Oakland’s Creek to Bay Day, I joined 100 volunteers for I Heart Oakland-Alameda Estuary to remove shoreline trash.
RCDs Pay Extra Attention to North Bay High Schoolers
A $13,500 grant will help three North Bay conservation districts evaluate youth education programs and prepare high school students for environmental careers.
Creeks Make Good & Bad Homes
San Jose State researcher Costanza Rampini explores why the houseless favor creek banks, and how they weather the flood risk.
Bay Area Braces for Record-Breaking El Niño
Record high water temperatures in the Pacific are expected to bring dangerous sea level rise, waves, and rain to the region this winter.
Regional Housing Agency Invests in Affordability
The Bay Area Housing Finance Authority is launching a loan program to support the construction of mixed-income rental properties.
While the new rules will burden developers with higher upfront project costs, this impact, Udvardy and others argue, will be relatively insignificant. For one thing, the federal government will pay 75% of the increased cost of affected projects, leaving developers paying an average of just 2% more. For a $1 million job, that’s less than $5,000.
Moreover, money invested in more resilient infrastructure tends to be cash well spent. A report from the National Institute of Building Sciences shows that every dollar invested to protect against riverine flooding, for example, means $6 saved later when waters rise.
“This ensures that we invest our taxpayer dollars responsibly,” Udvardy said.
